ENGL 200 (Sections AO, AS): Expository Writing II
Fall 2001 -- MWF 12:30-1:20 p.m., 1:30-2:20 p.m.
 
Schedule of Classes | Daedalus Online
Update for September 14th
 
 
Professor Westman
108 Denison Hall; 532-2171
Office Hours: M, W 9-10 a.m. and by app't
Email: westmank@ksu.edu
 
 
Course Philosophy and Description
Expository Writing II is the second of two courses required of all students here at Kansas State University. In this writing class, you will study and practice argumentation, so you are prepared for the complex writing tasks that you will do as a college student and later in your workplace and community. We will write five essays, which will be due roughly every three weeks. Your essays will be persuasive pieces that use written argument to explore and persuade others to some new attitude or action.
 
While some of your writing will take place in the classroom, much of what you must satisfactorily complete for the course will require time outside the classroom: reading assignments about aspects of argumentation, writing activities which prepare you for the assignments, generating ideas for drafts, and completing drafts and revisions according to the schedule below.


Texts
Ramage, John D. and John C. Bean, Writing Arguments (5th edition)
Kanning, Sarah L. Expository Writing 200 (3rd edition)
Daedalus Online PIN Card (Core Version)
Recommended: Hacker, Diane, Rules for Writers and a college-level dictionary


Supplies
Several letter-sized filing folders for keeping and handing in your work
8 ½ x 11 college-ruled notebook paper
#2 pencils, pens with blue or black ink
Credit on your K-State Wildcat Card to print
Formatted disks dedicated to this course for storing and backing up your computer files


Attendance: Since the University requires that students attend all classes in which they are enrolled, there are no excused absences. If you are absent for more than nine classroom hours (nine class periods), you will fail this class automatically. If you are absent for more than three, you jeopardize your final grade for the course.
 
If you wish to receive a passing grade in this class, then, attendance is very important. Classroom work or homework assignments missed due to absence cannot be made up. If you are absent, it is your responsibility to find out from another class member any announcements or assignments. (On those rare occasions when circumstances make it impossible for you attend, please notify me by email or in person in advance so we can discuss the absence.)


Essays: You will write five major assignments for this course. All assigned work is due on the day and time listed below. I do not accept late work. You may arrange for one alternate due date during the semester in advance of the paper's due date; be sure to speak with me in advance, if you need to exercise this option.
 
Drafts and revisions of papers must be typed, double-spaced, with one inch margins (one page = 250 words); the pages should be spell-checked, proof-read, and stapled or paper-clipped together. Your name, my name, the date, and the type of assignment should appear in the upper-left hand corner of the first page. A "Works Cited" page should accompany any assignment that refers to outside sources. Submit the paper in a manila file folder with your name written on the tab. Title pages are not necessary. Do not submit your work in a report cover.


Honor Code and Plagiarism: Be extremely careful in acknowledging the sources that have influenced your work. Should you incorporate the ideas, general phrasing, or exact words of any other source without properly crediting the author, you are guilty of plagiarism and of failure to follow the University's Honor Code. The penalty for plagiarism is severe: you may fail the course and the Dean may be notified of the reason for your failure. If you have any questions about whether you need to cite a source, please see me or consult Hacker's Rules for Writers or Kanning's Expository Writing 200.


Grades: Your grade for the course will be based on your preparation, drafting, and revising of the five writing assignments for the class, as well as your attendance and participation in the class. During the course, I will give you written feedback about your writing, its content, and its effect on your intended audience. I will tell you what's already working well and what still needs work. Some key points:

-- You must pass the Final Portfolio Examination at the end of term to pass the course, no matter what your grades have been during the term.
 
-- Major papers will receive one of four letter grades: R, C, B, or A. The grades you receive on these drafts reflect how I think the paper matches up to the grading standards for the Expository Writing Program. I will clearly indicate to you if I think your paper will pass the Final Portfolio Examination required of all students. Papers that I believe will not pass the Final Portfolio Examination will receive a grade of "R" for "Revision needed," and you must revise these papers in a week's time to receive a grade. If you do not turn in the revised "R" paper within a week, the paper will earn an "F."
 
-- Remember that a paper's grade depends on your hard work during the whole writing process, which will often include in-class and out of class writing exercises, preparing a draft, participating in peer review workshops, and revising. To receive full credit for your hard work, be sure to keep all notes, peer review comments, and drafts for each assignment.
 
-- Because writing develops with lots of thinking and writing and over several drafts, I do have a policy that will also allow you to revise some of your work for a higher grade (see the Revision Policy below).


Portfolio Examination: At the end of week 8 or the beginning of week 9, you will turn in one of your papers to be evaluated for the Midterm Portfolio Examination. A different instructor will read your paper to determine if it meets the minimum requirements for this course. If it passes, it can then be used in the Final Portfolio Examination as a passing paper.


During the last week of class, you will turn in a Final Portfolio that will contain 3 of the five papers you wrote for this class. Again, a different instructor will read your portfolio to determine if it passes. Portfolio readers do not determine your final grade; they just determine if your portfolio passes or fails the course. After I get the results of the Final Portfolio Examination, I will assign you letter grades based on your written work, attendance, and class participation. Please note: it is possible to pass the Portfolio Examination and still fail this course for lack of attendance, excessive lateness, poor class participation, failing to hand work in on time, and plagiarism. For more information about the Portfolio Examination, see the "Instructions to Students for the Portfolio Examination" in Kanning.


Revision Policy: I require you to attempt revision on any essay which receives a grade of "R"and to keep revising until that essay reaches the acceptable level. If you do not turn in a revision of an essay that received an "R" within a week's time limit, that essay will receive a permanent grade of "R" and will be calculated as an "F." Though I do not require revisions of essays which earn acceptable grades when first submitted, I do allow you the option to revise such an essay once. You may not revise in-class essays for higher grades.
 
You must also earn the right to revise any of your major papers for this class. In order to earn this right, you must do all the homework, classroom activities, and participate seriously in the peer-review workshops for each assignment. If you are absent on workshop days or for some other reason do not participate in all the activities leading up to a final draft, you will not be allowed to revise for a higher grade. If you do the activities, homework, and participate in all the peer-review opportunities, you will find that your writing will improve over the term.
 
A paper will be considered revised when it demonstrates significant change in global issues such as focus/purpose (Is the paper on one topic? Is the writer's purpose clear?), or arrangement (Is the order of the information logical and easy to follow?), or development (Is there enough detail and support for the reader to clearly understand the issue), or tone (Is the reader addressing the audience appropriately for the purpose and occasion?). Revisions that do not meet this criteria will be returned unread. Simply correcting errors in spelling, punctuation, or grammar is not revision but editing.


Remember that a revision does not automatically receive a better grade. If you choose to revise, keep in mind that the whole paper may need revision once you begin to revise one element of its argument and presentation. If you choose to revise a paper and it earns another grade, I will replace the first grade with the second grade. Before you revise, I strongly encourage you to arrange for a conference with a Writing Center Tutor or with me to discuss your plans for revision. If you do not seem to be making any improvements on a particular paper, I will advise you to leave it and work on a difference assignment.


Your revision must include the following or it will be returned unread:
-- Underline and explain any additions you make to the text on the new version.
-- Mark any deletions on the old version.
-- Write a summary on a separate page explaining why and how you revised -- for example, why you decided to change the paper's focus or arrangement, why you added or deleted a certain part of the paper, why you rearranged the information, and so forth.
-- With the revision, you must turn in all previous notes and drafts, peer response sheets, and a clear label of which assignment you are revising. Place all these items in a file folder with your name on it.


Computing: Over the course of the semester we will be using Daedalus Online, a computer software you have access to by purchasing a Daedalus Online PIN Card at the bookstore. Our work with computers is designed not only as another forum for practicing argumentation, but as a way for you to sharpen your communication skills for an increasingly technological age.
 
If you do not yet have an email account, I encourage you to activate your KSU account. I highly recommend email as a way of touching base with me about your writing -- a kind of virtual office hours. You can send me queries, your thesis statement for an essay, or anything else that could be handled with a quick exchange of messages. I check my email in the morning before classes, in the afternoon, and in the evening.


Conferences: I want you to succeed in this course, and I am happy to meet with you about your writing and your progress. I encourage you to see me before writing assignments are due, or if you have questions about material we discuss in class. Please feel free to stop by during office hours (M, W 9-10 a.m.), or contact me by phone or email to arrange a more convenient time to meet.


Note: If you have any condition such as a physical or learning disability that will make it difficult for you to carry out the work as I have outlined it or which will require academic accommodations, please notify me in the first two weeks of the semester.
 
 
Schedule of Classes (subject to change)


Evaluating an Argument
Week 1
   
 (Preparation for class)
  
  (In class activities)

Aug

20

1
 
--
Introduction to Course Policies and Goals
Introduce in-class writing assignment for 8/22.

Aug

22

2
Log on to Daedalus Online using your PIN Card and initiate your account.
 
Prepare in-class writing assignment according to directions.
Do in-class writing assignment.

Aug

24

3
Read Chapter 1 (3-23) in Writing Arguments (WA).
Read pages 282-88 in WA.
Do exercise on page 288-9 for one of the classes listed (a-i).
What is a good argument?
Discuss exercise on p.288-9.
Week 2

Aug

27

4
Read pp.452-4 in WA.
Do Task 1, p.453 in class.
Introduce Evaluation Essay Assignment.
Evaluation is a Criteria Match.
Review responses to Task 1, p.453.
Do Task 2, p.454 in class.

Aug

29

5
Do Task 3, pp.455 in WA.
Do Task 4, p.461 in class.
Develop and defend criteria for good argumentation.

Aug

31

6
Read Chapter 2 (24-47) in WA.
Read pp. 292-3 in WA.
How "Says and Does"helps you understand what you read.
Do exercise on p.32 in class.
Week 3

Sep

3

7
--
No Class - Labor Day

Sep

5

8
Read "Marijuana for Medical Purposes" in Expository Writing 200 (EW 200), pp. 107-8.
Write "says" and "does" statements for each paragraph. (Your goal: to understand the argument's major claims and how it is put together.)
Understanding the How and What of an Argument.
Discussion of essay and "says" and "does" statements.

Sep

7

9
Read EW200, pp.33-9, 42-5.
Complete Respond Sequence in Daedalus Online (DOL) for one of the sample essays and print it out.
Review Student Samples (EW200).
Organization of Evaluation Essays.
Evidence in Evaluation Essays: Quoting from your source.
Week 4

Sep

10

10
Read WA, pp.445-52.
 
Complete "Organizing Your Evaluation Essay" in EW200, pp.35-7.
 
Reminder: First draft due 9/12.
More on evidence in Evaluation Essays.
 
Learning about Peer Review and linking review comments to grading/passing criteria.

Sep

12

11
Bring three copies of first draft for Peer Review.
Peer Review Session.
More on linking review comments to Grading/Passing Criteria.
Leave with a revision plan.
Sep 14 12
Bring three copies of second draft for Peer Review.
Peer Review Session.
Leave with a revision plan.
 
Components of Argument
Week 5

Sep

17

13
Section AO:
Bring three copies of second draft for Peer Review.
_________________
Section AS:
Read Chapter 4 (75-87) in WA.
Do exercises on pp.78-9, p.81.
Evaluation Essay due by 4pm to DE108.
Section AO:
Peer Review Session.
Leave with a revision plan.
________________
Section AS:
Transition to a detailed understanding of arguments.
Exercise on p.84 in class.

Sep

19

14
Section AO:
Read Chapter 4 (75-87) in WA.
Do exercises on pp.78-9, p.81.
Evaluation Essay due by 4pm on Tuesday, Sept. 18th to DE108.
_________________
Section AS:
Read Chapter 5 (88-106) in WA
Do exercise on p.91, #1-6, in WA.
Section AO:
Transition to a detailed understanding of arguments.
Exercise on p.84 in class.
 
_________________
Section AS:
Structure of Argument: Claims, Stated Reasons, Grounds, Warrants, Backing, Rebuttals, and Qualifiers.
Review exercise on p.96 in WA.

Sep

21

15
Section AO:
Read Chapter 5 (88-106) in WA
Do exercise on p.91, #1-6, in WA.
Do exercise on p.100 of WA, choosing 2 of the remaining 9 enthymemic arguments.
_________________
Section AS:
Do exercise on p.100 of WA, choosing 2 of the remaining 9 enthymemic arguments.
Section AO:
Structure of Argument: Claims, Stated Reasons, Grounds, Warrants, Backing, Rebuttals, and Qualifiers.
Review exercise on p.96 in WA. Review responses to exercise on p.100.
_________________
Section AS:
More on Structure of Argument.
Review responses to exercise on p.100.
Proposal Arguments: How to Change Reality
Week 6

Sep

24

16
Read Chapter 14 (307-45) in WA.
Introduce Proposal Essay assignment.
Proposals: We should/should no do X.
Rhetorical situations.
Practical vs. Policy Proposals.

Sep

26

17
Bring three possible topics written out to hand in. Have one that you are fairly sure about and two for back-up.
Finding an issue for a proposal.
Who is your rhetorical audience?
Do exercise on p.317 in class.

Sep

28

18
Read Chapter 7 (132-151) in WA.
Do exercises on pp.135-6 and pp.148-51.
Audience-Based Reasons.
Discuss responses to exercises on pp.135-6 and on pp.148-51 in class.
Do exercise on p.138 in class.
Week 7

Oct

1

19
With your topic for your proposal essay in mind, write out answers to questions about "Audience-Based Reasons" on pp.136-7 of WA and write out answers to "Stock Issues" on pp.317-8 of WA.
More on Audience-Based Reasons.

Oct

3

20
Read pp.87-91 in EW200.
Complete Respond Sequence on DOL for one of the sample proposals and print it out.
How Proposals are presented and organized.

Oct

5

21
Bring three copies of first draft for Peer Review.
Peer Review Session.
Linking Review comments to grading/passing criteria.
Leave with a Revision Plan.
Week 8

Oct

8

22
Bring three copies of second draft for Peer Review.
Peer Review Session.
Determine readings for next assignments.
Leave with a Revision Plan.


Researched Debate

Oct

10

23
Read pp.56-60 and the sample essay on pp.67-8 of EW200.
 
Proposal due by 4pm to DE 108.
Introduce Researched Debate Essay.
Review sample essay.

Oct

12

24
AO:
Read in Writing Arguments Michael Medved's "A Sickness in the Soul" (488-493), Barbara Streisand's "The Artist as Citizen" (493-498), and John Leo's "Kill for Kicks Video Games Desensitizing Our Children" (467-468).
 
Complete Respond Sequence on DOL for one of the selected essays and print it out.
 
Submit essay for Midterm Portfolio Review in class.
 
AS:
Read in Writing Arguments John Leo's "Kill-for-Kicks Video Games Desensitizing Our Children" (467-468) and Charlie James's "Littleton Massacre Seems So...American" (475-476).
 
Complete Respond Sequence on DOL for one of the selected essays and print it out.
 
Submit essay for Midterm Portfolio Review in class.
Discuss essays of class's choice.
Week 9

Oct

15

25
AO:
Read in Writing Arguments Helen Nixon's "Adults Watching Children Watch South Park" (498-504), Ron Weiskind's "South Park Movie Revels in Its Really Bad Behavior" (504-505), and Mike Males's "Stop Blaming Kids and TV" (468-472)
 
Complete Respond Sequence on DOL for two of the selected essays and print them out.
Develop one "issue question" for debate topic to hand in.
 
AS:
Read in Writing Arguments Mike Males's "Stop Blaming Kids and TV" (468-472), Gloria Steinem's "Supremacy Crimes" (472-475), and Chuck Shelton's "When White Boys Kill, White Dads Fail" (476-478).
 
Complete Respond Sequence on DOL for two of the selected essays and print them out.
Develop one "issue question" for debate topic to hand in.
Discuss essays of class's choice.
Review all essays.
Discussion of "issue questions" for researched debate topic.

Oct

17

26
Reread pp.56-60 and pp.67-8 in EW200. Determine the issue question, the "pro" and "con" claims, and reasons you will use for your debate essay. Bring a copy of them to class.
Review format for Researched Debate Essay.
Developing Reasons and Rebuttals.

Oct

19

--
--
Fall Break -- No Class.
Week 10

Oct

22

27
Read pp.387-423 in WA.
 
Begin drafting your outline for your debate essay using the flow chart on p.57.
Using sources effectively and avoiding plagiarism.

Oct

24

28
Bring two copies of first draft for Peer Review: one to hand in and one to use in class.
Group Peer Review Session.
Linking review comments to grading/passing criteria.
Leave with a Revision Plan.

Oct

26

29
Bring three copies of second draft for Peer Review.
Peer Review Session.
Leave with a Revision Plan.


Persuasive Research Paper
Week 11

Oct

29

30
Read pp.63-67 in WA.
 
Researched Debate due by 4pm to DE108.
Introduce Persuasive Research Paper.
Do Set I, Tasks 1 & 3 on pp.68-9 in class.

Oct

31

31
Read Chap 16 (361-386) and review Chapter 17 (387-430) in WA.
Decide topic for research paper and hand in for approval.
Organizational patterns for research reports; review p.64 in WA.
Finding, Selecting, Using, and Documenting Sources.

Nov

2

32
Read two sample student research essays on pp. 24-32 in Prairie Lights 2001.
Review sample student research papers.
Week 12

Nov

5

33
Develop working thesis claim and at least three reasons for your topic, and bring them to class.
Developing Opposing Views and Refutations.

Nov

7

34
Identify the 4-6 sources which will best suit your topic and working thesis claim. Bring them to class.
More on Selecting, Using, and Documenting Sources.

Nov

9

35
Work on organizing research for Persuasive Research Paper and begin outline.
No Class
Week 13

Nov

12

36
Bring two copies of outline to class and draft of body paragraph for first reason in support of thesis claim.
Review outlines, paragraph structure, use of sources, documentation for sources.

Nov

14

37
Bring two copies of first draft for Peer Review Session.
Group Peer Review Session.
Linking Review Comments to grading/passing criteria.

Nov

16

38
Bring three copies of second draft for Peer Review Session.
Peer Review Session.
Week 14

Nov

19

39
Prepare final revised draft incorporating all peer review suggestions and correction.
Locate hard copies of all sources used and highlight material used in paper.
Verify correct citation format for "Works Cited" page and in-text citations.
Workday/Conferences: Bring one copy of revised draft, including "Works Cited" page to class.
Nov 20 --
Persuasive Research Paper due by 4pm to DE108.

Nov

21-23

-- --
NO CLASS
 
THANKSGIVING BREAK


Letter to the Portfolio Reader
Week 15

Nov

26

40
Read pp.4-8 and p.115 in EW200.
Introduction to "Letter to Portfolio Reader"
Review Student Samples: Common Organizational Patterns and Details to Support Claims.

Nov

28

41
Bring all your papers to class.
Begin Invention work for letter.

Nov

30

42
Complete Invention work for your letter.
Begin preparing a written thesis statement and outline for your letter.
Planning session for Letter and Gathering Evidence.
Draft outline and thesis by end of class.
Week 16

Dec

3

43
Revise outline and lists of examples in preparation for in-class writing.
Write "Letter to Portfolio Reader" in class.

Dec

5

44
Prepare revisions to existing drafts in preparation for Final Portfolio Review.
Workday/Conferences.

Dec

7

45
Prepare revisions to existing drafts in preparation for Final Portfolio Review.
Workday/Conferences.
Finals Week

Mon

Dec

10

Final Portfolios due.
 
 
Home | Previous Courses | Women's Studies Links | Literary Links
Department of English | Kansas State University
Email: westmank@ksu.edu
Last updated 26 November 2001